4 Temmuz 2012 Çarşamba

In Europe, Looking for Patient Bond Buyers

To contact us Click HERE


LONDON — As Europe slouches toward a monetary union that aims to force euro area governments to cede control over their banks and budgets, a crucial question remains unanswered: how to persuade investors to buy, and hold for the long term, the bonds of at-risk economies like Italy and Spain.
Multimedia
Interactive Feature
Tracking Europe's Debt Crisis

Related

  • Germany Cedes Some Ground in Steps to Bolster Euro (June 30, 2012)
  • Today's Economist: What Must Be Done Now to Save the Euro?(June 29, 2012)
  • Markets Cheer Europe’s Bailout Plan (June 30, 2012)
Both countries have debt and deficit levels that are no worse, and in some cases better, than those of Britain, Japan and the United States. But because they cannot devalue their currencies and must instead impose growth-sapping economic measures to regain competitiveness, their bonds have traded as if their economies are near insolvent. Meanwhile, the securities of debt-racked Britain, for example, are snapped up with abandon.It is a paradox that lies at the heart of the European debt crisis. On Friday at its most recent summit meeting, Brussels took a halting first step to addressing this issue on a permanent basis. Euro zone leaders proposed that Europe’s current and future rescue facilities might buy Italian and Spanish bonds as long as these countries fulfilled Germany’s austerity demands and met debt and deficit targets. The market, expecting more waffling, jumped and the yields on 10-year Spanish and Italian bonds dropped sharply as investors celebrated the prospect that Europe might become a buyer of last resort of its beaten-down bonds.Still, Friday’s euphoria notwithstanding, economists and market participants remain doubtful that the bond market fears can be permanently assuaged until the European Central Bank intervenes with the force and conviction shown by its peers in the United States and Britain.Paul De Grauwe, a Belgian economist at the London School of Economics, says he believes that the latest step will not be enough. Mr. De Grauwe has written extensively on how the cycle of fear and panic in the bond markets is pushing countries that may not need a bailout to ask for one.The euro zone’s temporary bailout fund, the European Financial Stability Facility, which has only 248 billion euros at its disposal and must first raise the money on the bond market, does not have the firepower to convince skittish investors that Europe is serious, he said. Italy and Spain alone have a total of nearly 2.5 trillion euros in sovereign bonds outstanding.Mr. De Grauwe proposes instead, that the European Central Bank announce that it will be an aggressive buyer of Spanish or Italian bonds until the spread — or the difference between the yields on these bonds and benchmark German bonds — reaches a certain level, say 300 basis points, compared with the recent level of 500 basis points and above.“You would then have a floor on bond prices and it would be attractive for investors to buy Spanish bonds again,” said Mr. De Grauwe.His most recent paper claims that the Spanish and Italian bond rout has been driven more by the psychology of fear than hard and true economic numbers.“The E.F.S.F. does not have the credibility given its resources,” Mr. De Grauwe said. “What you need are the unlimited resources of a central bank.”Such a forceful approach has been resisted by Germany, the bank’s largest shareholder, on the basis that countries would not proceed with necessary reforms. It is also true that the E.C.B. has intervened in the markets before and is said to own close to 150 billion euros of weak euro zone country bonds.http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/30/business/global/return-of-long-term-bond-buyers-seen-as-crucial-to-europe.html

Xi Jinping Millionaire Relations Reveal Fortunes Of Elite

Xi Jinping, the man in line to be China’s next president, warned officials on a 2004 anti-graft conference call: “Rein in your spouses, children, relatives, friends and staff, and vow not to use power for personal gain.”As Xi climbed the Communist Party ranks, his extended family expanded their business interests to include minerals, real estate and mobile-phone equipment, according to public documents compiled by Bloomberg.Enlarge imageChina's Vice President Xi Jinping Xi Jinping, vice president of China, visits the China Shipping terminal at the Port of Los Angeles in Los Angeles, California, U.S., on Thursday, Feb. 16, 2012. Source: BloombergEnlarge imageXi Jinping Millionaire Relations Reveal Elite Chinese Fortunes The Belleview Drive property is viewed along with other residential buildings in Repulse Bay, Hong Kong. Source: BloombergEnlarge imageXi Jinping Millionaire Relations Reveal Elite Chinese Fortunes The Belleview Drive property, bottom second right, is viewed along with other residential buildings in Repulse Bay, Hong Kong. Source: BloombergEnlarge imageXi Jinping Millionaire Relations Reveal Elite Chinese Fortunes The entrance to the Belleview Drive property is seen in Repulse Bay, Hong Kong. Source: BloombergEnlarge imageXi Zhongxun's Family Photograph A screen grab from the website www.1921.org.cn shows Xi Zhongxun's family photograph taken in 2000. Front, from left: daughter Xi Qianping, wife Qi Xin, grandson Mingzheng, Xi Zhongxun, daughter Qi Qiaoqiao. Second row, from left: grandson Zannong, son-in-law Wu Long, daughter Qi An'an, son Xi Jinping, son Xi Yuanping, son-in-law Deng Jiagui, grandson Dongdong. Source: www.1921.org.cn via BloombergEnlarge imageQi Qiaoqiao Qi Qiaoqiao leads Tsinghua University EMBA students in a drum performance on Sept 18, 2010. Source: ImaginechinaEnlarge imageHiu Ng Hiu Ng, center, attends the Boao Forum for Asia Conference 2011, 'Young Leaders Roundtable: Charting Growth - Include the Excluded', in Hainan, China, on April 14, 2011. Source: ImaginechinaEnlarge imageDaniel Foa Daniel Foa, founder of 51Sim, right, and Chinese actress Li Bingbing at the Sustainable Innovation Student Competition in Beijing, China, on Nov. 2, 2009. Source: ImaginechinaEnlarge imageNew Postcom Equipment Co. A screen grab shows the website of New Postcom Equipment Co. Source: www.newpostcom.com via BloombergEnlarge imageHiconics Drive Technology Co. A screen grab shows the website of Hiconics Drive Technology Co. Source: www.hiconics.com via BloombergThose interests include investments in companies with total assets of $376 million; an 18 percent indirect stake in a rare- earths company with $1.73 billion in assets; and a $20.2 million holding in a publicly traded technology company. The figures don’t account for liabilities and thus don’t reflect the family’s net worth.No assets were traced to Xi, who turns 59 this month; his wife Peng Liyuan, 49, a famous People’s Liberation Army singer; or their daughter, the documents show. There is no indication Xi intervened to advance his relatives’ business transactions, or of any wrongdoing by Xi or his extended family.While the investments are obscured from public view by multiple holding companies, government restrictions on access to company documents and in some cases online censorship, they are identified in thousands of pages of regulatory filings.The trail also leads to a hillside villa overlooking the South China Sea in Hong Kong, with an estimated value of $31.5 million. The doorbell ringer dangles from its wires, and neighbors say the house has been empty for years. The family owns at least six other Hong Kong properties with a combined estimated value of $24.1 million.

Standing Committee

Xi has risen through the party over the past three decades, holding leadership positions in several provinces and joining the ruling Politburo Standing Committee in 2007. Along the way, he built a reputation for clean government.He led an anti-graft campaign in the rich coastal province of Zhejiang, where he issued the “rein in” warning to officials in 2004, according to a People’s Daily publication. In Shanghai, he was brought in as party chief after a 3.7 billion- yuan ($582 million) scandal.A 2009 cable from the U.S. Embassy in Beijing cited an acquaintance of Xi’s saying he wasn’t corrupt or driven by money. Xi was “repulsed by the all-encompassing commercialization of Chinese society, with its attendant nouveau riche, official corruption, loss of values, dignity, and self- respect,” the cable disclosed by Wikileaks said, citing the friend. Wikileaks publishes secret government documents online.A U.S. government spokesman declined to comment on the document.

Carving Economy

Increasing resentment over China’s most powerful families carving up the spoils of economic growth poses a challenge for the Communist Party. The income gap in urban China has widened more than in any other country in Asia over the past 20 years, according to the International Monetary Fund.“The average Chinese person gets angry when he hears about deals where people make hundreds of millions, or even billions of dollars, by trading on political influence,” said Barry Naughton, professor of Chinese economy at the University of California, San Diego, who wasn’t referring to the Xi family specifically.Scrutiny of officials’ wealth is intensifying before a once-in-a-decade transition of power later this year, when Xi and the next generation of leaders are set to be promoted. The ouster in March of Bo Xilai as party chief of China’s biggest municipality in an alleged graft and murder scandal fueled public anger over cronyism and corruption. It also spurred demands that top officials disclose their wealth in editorials in two Chinese financial publications and from microbloggers. Bo’s family accumulated at least $136 million in assets, Bloomberg News reported in April.

Revolutionary Leader

Xi and his siblings are the children of the late Xi Zhongxun, a revolutionary fighter who helped Mao Zedong win control of China in 1949 with a pledge to end centuries of inequality and abuse of power for personal gain. That makes them “princelings,” scions of top officials and party figures whose lineages can help them wield influence in politics and business.Most of the extended Xi family’s assets traced by Bloomberg were owned by Xi’s older sister,Qi Qiaoqiao, 63; her husband Deng Jiagui, 61; and Qi’s daughter Zhang Yannan, 33, according to public records compiled by Bloomberg.Deng held an indirect 18 percent stake as recently as June 8 in Jiangxi Rare Earth & Rare Metals Tungsten Group Corp. Prices of the minerals used in wind turbines and U.S. smart bombs have surged as China tightened supply.

Yuanwei Group

Qi and Deng’s share of the assets of Shenzhen Yuanwei Investment Co., a real-estate and diversified holding company, totaled 1.83 billion yuan ($288 million), a December 2011 filing shows. Other companies in the Yuanwei group wholly owned by the couple have combined assets of at least 539.3 million yuan ($84.8 million).A 3.17 million-yuan investment by Zhang in Beijing-based Hiconics Drive Technology Co. (300048) has increased 40-fold since 2009 to 128.4 million yuan ($20.2 million) as of yesterday’s close in Shenzhen.Deng, reached on his mobile phone, said he was retired. When asked about his wife, Zhang and their businesses across the country, he said: “It’s not convenient for me to talk to you about this too much.” Attempts to reach Qi and Zhang directly or through their companies by phone and fax, as well as visits to addresses found on filings, were unsuccessful.

New Postcom

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-29/xi-jinping-millionaire-relations-reveal-fortunes-of-elite.html

This Week in Money

To contact us Click HERE

 | Podcast: Download (Duration: 42:25 — 29.1MB)
  • Danielle Park — European Summit background.
  • Bob Hoye — Summit details.
  • Sean Brodrick — Latest on China.
Advertisement
Email This Post Email This Post
avatar



To get more 'This Week in Money' Radio Shows, please visit the Show Archives.

Gold Traders Extend Bullish Call On European Debt Crisis



Gold traders are bullish for a sixth week on speculation that Europe’s debt crisis will boost demand from investors seeking to protect their wealth and drive prices higher after moving to within 1 percentage of a bear market.Sixteen analysts surveyed by Bloomberg said they expect a rally next week and 10 were bearish. Another five were neutral. Investors added almost $2 billion to holdings in gold-backedexchange-traded products this month, the most since November, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Hedge funds and other speculators have increased bets on a rally for four consecutive weeks, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission data show.Enlarge imageHedge Funds Boost Bullish Bets as Stimulus Pressure Rises One thousand gram gold bars. Photographer: Kerem Uzel/BloombergSpain formally asked for a bailout for its banks on June 25 and Cyprus that day became the fifth member of the 17-nation euro zone to ask for outside help. European leaders agreed today to ease repayment rules for emergency loans to Spanish banks and relax conditions on potential help for Italy. Gold came close to a bear market in May as some investors sold bullion to cover losses in stock markets as $7 trillion was erased from global equities in about two months.“While demand has been weaker for bullion in recent months, it has picked up in the last month,” said Mark O’Byrne, the executive director of Dublin-based GoldCore Ltd., a brokerage that sells and stores everything from quarter-ounce British Sovereigns to 400-ounce bars. “A resolution to the crisis is not going to be seen in the short term. A lot more speculators could pile back into the market.”

Prices Slide

Gold tumbled 4.4 percent to $1,598.40 an ounce since the end of March, the biggest retreat since the third quarter of 2008. Bullion is up 2 percent this year which compares with an 8.8 percent slide in the Standard & Poor’s GSCI gauge of 24 commodities and a 3.9 percent advance in the MSCI All-Country World Index of equities. Treasuries returned 2.1 percent, a Bank of America Corp. index shows.The metal fell 3.8 percent last week, the most this year, as the Federal Reserve refrained from announcing a new round of debt purchases to shore up growth. Bank of England GovernorMervyn King told lawmakers June 26 the world isn’t yet halfway through the global financial crisis that began in 2007 and said his backing for more stimulus this month reflected concern the outlook is deteriorating amid Europe’s debt crisis.

ETP Holdings


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-28/gold-traders-extend-bullish-streak-on-debt-crisis-commodities.html


The Scam Wall Street Learned From the Mafia Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-scam-wall-street-learned-from-the-mafia-20120620#ixzz1zV4h4Y9H

To contact us Click HERE
From the Rolling Stone Magazine
How America's biggest banks took part in a nationwide bid-rigging conspiracy - until they were caught on tape

By MATT TAIBBIJune 21, 2012 11:20 AM ETnational affairsIllustration by Victor JuhaszSomeday, it will go down in history as the first trial of the modern American mafia. Of course, you won't hear the recent financial corruption case, United States of America v. Carollo, Goldberg and Grimm, called anything like that. If you heard about it at all, you're probably either in the municipal bond business or married to an antitrust lawyer. Even then, all you probably heard was that a threesome of bit players on Wall Street got convicted of obscure antitrust violations in one of the most inscrutable, jargon-packed legal snoozefests since the government's massive case against Microsoft in the Nineties – not exactly the thrilling courtroom drama offered by the famed trials of old-school mobsters like Al Capone or Anthony "Tony Ducks" Corallo.But this just-completed trial in downtown New York against three faceless financial executives really was historic. Over 10 years in the making, the case allowed federal prosecutors to make public for the first time the astonishing inner workings of the reigning American crime syndicate, which now operates not out of Little Italy and Las Vegas, but out of Wall Street.The defendants in the case – Dominick Carollo, Steven Goldberg and Peter Grimm – worked for GE Capital, the finance arm of General Electric. Along with virtually every major bank and finance company on Wall Street – not just GE, but J.P. Morgan Chase, Bank of America, UBS, Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Wachovia and more – these three Wall Street wiseguys spent the past decade taking part in a breathtakingly broad scheme to skim billions of dollars from the coffers of cities and small towns across America. The banks achieved this gigantic rip-off by secretly colluding to rig the public bids on municipal bonds, a business worth $3.7 trillion. By conspiring to lower the interest rates that towns earn on these investments, the banks systematically stole from schools, hospitals, libraries and nursing homes – from "virtually every state, district and territory in the United States," according to one settlement. And they did it so cleverly that the victims never even knew they were being ­cheated. No thumbs were broken, and nobody ended up in a landfill in New Jersey, but money disappeared, lots and lots of it, and its manner of disappearance had a familiar name: organized crime.In fact, stripped of all the camouflaging financial verbiage, the crimes the defendants and their co-conspirators committed were virtually indistinguishable from the kind of thuggery practiced for decades by the Mafia, which has long made manipulation of public bids for things like garbage collection and construction contracts a cornerstone of its business. What's more, in the manner of old mob trials, Wall Street's secret machinations were revealed during the Carollo trial through crackling wiretap recordings and the lurid testimony of cooperating witnesses, who came into court with bowed heads, pointing fingers at their accomplices. The new-age gangsters even invented an elaborate code to hide their crimes. Like Elizabethan highway robbers who spoke in thieves' cant, or Italian mobsters who talked about "getting a button man to clip the capo," on tape after tape these Wall Street crooks coughed up phrases like "pull a nickel out" or "get to the right level" or "you're hanging out there" – all code words used to manipulate the interest rates on municipal bonds. The only thing that made this trial different from a typical mob trial was the scale of the crime.USA v. Carollo involved classic cartel activity: not just one corrupt bank, but many, all acting in careful concert against the public interest. In the years since the economic crash of 2008, we've seen numerous hints that such orchestrated corruption exists. The collapses of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, for instance, both pointed to coordi­nated attacks by powerful banks and hedge funds determined to speed the demise of those firms. In the bankruptcy of Jefferson County, Alabama, we learned that Goldman Sachs accepted a $3 million bribe from J.P. Morgan Chase to permit Chase to serve as the sole provider of toxic swap deals to the rubes running metropolitan Birmingham – "an open-and-shut case of anti-competitive behavior," as one former regulator described it.More recently, a major international investigation has been launched into the manipulation of Libor, the interbank lending index that is used to calculate global interest rates for products worth more than $3 trillion a year. If and when that case is presented to the public at trial – there are several major civil suits in the works here in the States – we may yet find out that the world's most powerful banks have, for years, been fixing the prices of almost every adjustable-rate vehicle on earth, from mortgages and credit cards to interest-rate swaps and even currencies.But USA v. Carollo marks the first time we actually got incontrovertible evidence that Wall Street has moved into this cartel-type brand of criminality. It also offered a disgusting glimpse into the enabling and grossly cynical role played by politicians, who took Super Bowl tickets and bribe-stuffed envelopes to look the other way while gangsters raided the public kitty. And though the punishments that were ultimately handed down in the trial – minor convictions of three bit players – felt deeply unsatisfying, it was still a watershed moment in the ongoing story of America's gradual awakening to the realities of financial corruption. In a post-crash era where Wall Street trials almost never make it into court, and even the harshest settlements end with the evidence buried by the government and the offending banks permitted to escape with no admission of wrongdoing, this case finally dragged the whole ugly truth of American finance out into the open – and it was a hell of a show.1. THE SCAM
This was no trial scene from popular lore, no Inherit the Wind or State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson. No gallery packed with rapt spectators, no ceiling fans set whirring to beat back the tension and the heat, no defense counsel's resting a sympathetic hand on the defendant's shoulder as opening statements commence. No, the setting for USA v. Carollo reflected the bizarre alternate universe that exists on Wall Street. Like so many court cases involving big banks, the proceeding looked more like a roomful of expensive lawyers negotiating a major corporate merger than a public search for justice.The trial began on April 16th in a federal court in Lower Manhattan. The courtroom, an aerielike setting 23 stories up, offered a panoramic view of the city and the East River. Though the gallery was usually full throughout the three-plus weeks of testimony, the spectators were not average citizens come to witness how they had been robbed blind by America's biggest banks. Instead, there were row after row of suits – other lawyers eager to observe a long-awaited case, one that could influence the outcome in a handful of civil suits pending across the country. In fact, the defendants themselves, whom the trial would reveal as easily replaceable cogs in a much larger machine of corruption, were barely visible from the gallery, obscured by the great chattering congress of prosecution and defense attorneys.Only the presence of the mostly nonwhite and elderly jury, which resembled the front pew of a Harlem church, served as a reminder that the case had any connection to the real world. Even reporters from most of the major news outlets didn't bother to attend. The judge in the trial, the right honorable and amusingly cantankerous Harold Baer, acknowledged that the case was not likely to set the public's pulse racing. "It is unlikely, I think, that this will generate a lot of media publicity," Baer sighed to the jury in his preliminary instructions.|
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7


Another Domino Falls in the LIBOR Banking Scam: Royal Bank of Scotland

Another one bites the dust. The Royal Bank of Scotland is about to be fined $233 million (£150 million pounds) for its role in the Libor-rigging scandal. It joins Barclays as the first banks to walk the plank in what should be, but so far is not, the most sensational financial corruption story since the crash of 2008.Many of the banks implicated in the Libor mess have also been targeted in the various municipal bond bid-rigging investigations, and RBS is no different – its subsidiary Natwest is also a defendant in the major civil lawsuit in the bid-rigging case. The cases aren't related, except in the sense that they both involve manipulation and anticompetitive cooperation. It's going to be harder and harder to make the case that the major banks do not routinely cooperate at the expense of the public when it serves their purposes to do so.The news that RBS is involved comes with a perverse twist. This is from the Times UK:
The bank, which is 82 per cent owned by the taxpayer, is preparing for a political firestorm over the affair because it believes that it has no power to claw back bonuses from the traders responsible. Instead, the expected fines would be borne by the shareholders — largely the Government.
Libor manipulation is a crime that already robs the public to create bonuses for bankers. By artificially lowering interest rates, the banks caused cities, towns, countries, and other public entities to receive smaller returns on their variable-rate investment holdings. If it turns out that taxpayers end up paying the fine for RBS's crime of robbing taxpayers, how perfect would that be?

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/another-domino-falls-in-the-libor-banking-scam-royal-bank-of-scotland-20120629#ixzz1zV9TkXek



From The Big Picture

Satyajit Das: Europe and the World Is Saved, At Least Till Next Week?



Europe and the World Is Saved, At Least Till Next Week?
Satyajit Das
The Pavlovian response of financial markets to the European leaders’ summit of 28 and 29 June 2012 was remarkable. The frugal communiqué of 322 words fired the “animal spirits” of financial markets, which now believe that the European debt crisis has been “solved”. As comedian Robin Williams joked: “reality is just a crutch for people who can’t handle drugs.”Summiting Once More…The summit supported a single regulatory body for all European banks.The previously agreed Euro 100 billion capital injection for Spanish banks was ratified. Payments will now be made directly by the European Financial Stability Fund (“EFSF”) and its successor the European Stability Mechanism (“ESM”) to the banks rather than as loans to the relevant country. Loans will also not have priority of repayment over commercial lenders.http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2012/07/satyajit-das-europe-and-the-world-is-saved-at-least-till-next-week/

BRICs Priced For Economic Meltdown

To contact us Click HERE

From Bloomberg
he biggest emerging markets are contributing more than ever to the global economy as their proportion of the world stock market shrinks, leaving investors with the widest valuation gap in seven years.Brazil, Russia, India and China, known as the BRICs, will comprise 20 percent of the world economy this year after growing more than four-fold in the past decade, International Monetary Fund data show. At the same time, their combined stock-market value has dropped to a three-year low of 16 percent of the total invested in equities, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.Enlarge imageBRICs Priced for Economic Meltdown Dmitry Medvedev, Russia's president, center, waves to the media as he walks with Dilma Rousseff, Brazil's president, left, Manmohan Singh, India's prime minister, second from left, Hu Jintao, China's president, second from right, and Jacob Zuma, South Africa's president. Photographer: Graham Crouch/BloombergRoss Favors Technology Stocks, Emerging Markets
Play Video
June 28 (Bloomberg) -- Jim Ross, senior portfolio manager at AllianceBernstein LP, talks about European investment strategy and the inflation outlook. He speaks with Guy Johnson on Bloomberg Television's "The Pulse." (Source: Bloomberg)To Jim O’Neill, the chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management who coined the term BRIC in a 2001 research report, the 4 percentage point difference makes stocks in these markets irresistible. The last time the gap was this wide, in 2005, the MSCI BRIC Index (MXBRIC) jumped 53 percent in 12 months, more than double the gain in the MSCI All-Country World Index. (MXWD)“Unless we are seeing a major collapse of those economies, it’s a huge opportunity for investors,” O’Neill, who helps oversee $824 billion, said in a June 28 phone interview. The BRIC stock markets may double by 2020 as their share of world gross domestic product increases to about 27 percent, he said.Combined GDP in the BRICs will rise to more than $14 trillion this year from $2.8 trillion in 2002, according to the IMF. Their equity value, which includes locally-traded shares and companies based in the BRIC nations with primary listings abroad, has dropped to $7.6 trillion from $9.5 trillion a year ago, when they made up 18 percent of the global total, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Fund Outflows

Petroleo Brasileiro SA (PETR4), Brazil’s state-controlled oil company, fell to the world’s 39th-largest company by value from the 10th-biggest in July 2011. China Construction Bank Corp. (939)’s rank dropped to 20 from 12 while OAO Rosneft, Russia (INDEXCF)’s largest oil producer, sank to 106 from 70. ICICI Bank Ltd. (ICICIBC), India’s second-biggest lender, has lost 17 percent during the past year, compared with an average gain of 9 percent for global peers.The retreat has pared what was a 180 percent increase in the MSCI BRIC index since October 2008 and reflects concern that economic growth is slowing, according to John-Paul Smith, an emerging-market strategist at Deutsche Bank AG in London. Mutual funds that invest in BRIC equities, which recorded about $70 billion of inflows in the past decade, have posted 16 straight weeks of withdrawals, losing a net $5.3 billion, EPFR Global data show.http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-02/brics-priced-for-economic-meltdown.html

Can't they just do the right thing and not be forced to settle? QB


GlaxoSmithKline settles drug-marketing case for $3 billion

The British pharmaceutical giant agrees to pay a record healthcare-fraud settlement for promoting a number of drugs for uses not approved by federal regulators. California will get $46 million.

  • print
  • Comments1
  • Email
    Share
Glaxo settlementThe U.S. government said GlaxoSmithKline marketed its depression drug Paxil, above, to patients under 18, even though the Food and Drug Administration had not approved the drug for pediatric use. (Joe Raedle, Getty Images / July 2, 2012)
July 3, 2012GlaxoSmithKline, the maker of the popular depression drugs Paxil and Wellbutrin, agreed to plead guilty to federal charges and pay $3 billion in the largest healthcare-fraud settlement in U.S. history.The British pharmaceutical giant agreed to pay a nearly $1-billion fine for illegally marketing and promoting a number of well-known products for uses not approved by federal drug regulators, theU.S. Justice Department said Monday. The company will pay an additional $2 billion to settle allegations in connection with its sales, marketing and pricing practices on the state and federal level.As part of the agreement, California is set to receive $46 million, the largest sum of the 44 states involved in the settlement."Today's multibillion-dollar settlement is unprecedented in both scope and size. It underscores this administration's firm commitment to protecting the American people and holding accountable those who commit healthcare fraud," James Cole, U.S. deputy attorney general, said at a news conference in Washington.For its part, Glaxo said in a statement, "The company reached this settlement with the government to avoid the delay, expense, inconvenience and uncertainty of protracted litigation of the government's claims and to put behind us these long-standing investigations of what was, for the most part, very old conduct."The company's stock rose 79 cents, or 1.73%, to $46.36 on Monday.Critics of the settlement said the investigation did not go far enough. Public Citizen's Health Research Group issued a statement in which its director, Dr. Sidney Wolfe, called for more aggressive enforcement by federal regulators."Until more meaningful penalties and the prospect of jail time for company heads who are responsible for such activity become commonplace, companies will continue defrauding the government and putting patients' lives in danger," he said.The government said that Glaxo marketed its depression drug Paxil to patients under 18, even though the Food and Drug Administration had not approved the drug for pediatric use. It also said the company promoted Wellbutrin as a weight-loss drug and for the treatment of sexual dysfunctionand substance abuse addictions, and paid doctors millions of dollars to promote these unapproved uses of the drug. Doctors are permitted to prescribe drugs for "off label" conditions, but pharmaceutical companies are not allowed to market products for non-FDA-approved uses.Glaxo was also accused of failing to include important safety data to the FDA about its diabetes drugAvandia.In 2009, the attorney general's office announced the creation of the Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Team. The Justice Department has since amassed more than $10.2 billion in settlements and fines and has brought criminal charges against more than 800 defendants."California consumers have the right to expect that their health and well-being — and not profit — drives decisions about their care," said Kamala D. Harris, California's attorney general. "This settlement protects consumers and puts an end to unscrupulous marketing practices, kickbacks and illegal labeling of prescription drugs."http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-glaxo-settlement-20120703,0,7588461.story

Happy 4th of July

To contact us Click HERE
I said there would be no new thread today, but if you can spare the bandwidth maybe this will make living in the Land of the Free seem a little better today. Granted the banks and major corporations enjoy privileges that comes with access to our politicians in the Capitol, but so has most every big business past and present. Bribes and corruption are a part of societies and worse in many others. It is pervasive in all governmental agencies from the city, county, state and national level. May you all have a wonderful 4th of July. Your neighbour who cheats his taxes, or doesn't pay his mortgage to the local contractor paying an inspector to look the other way etc. Family and friends given contracts over more worthy bids. The MIC that awards contracts on a cost plus basis. We are all in this mess together and it will take a great change of direction to get us out.